Licentry vs Keygen

Keygen is a licensing and software distribution API that describes itself as built for developers, by developers. It is Fair Source, the code is on GitHub, and the Community Edition is free to self-host including for commercial work. Alongside licensing it ships a distribution API that signs and delivers releases and handles automatic updates.

Choose Licentry

Pick Licentry if your problem is people running your software without paying, and you want the enforcement layer to be the strong part.

Free trial, then 19 dollars a month. Studio is 59. Prices exclude VAT, which is added at checkout where it applies.
Choose Keygen

Pick Keygen if you want to self-host at no licence cost, or if getting builds and updates to customers is the actual job.

Free Dev tier, with paid plans listed from 49 dollars a month at the time of writing.

Figures about Keygen were checked in July 2026 against their own published pages, or, where they do not publish a figure, against the public listings named alongside the price above. Pricing changes, ours is on the pricing section, and if anything here is out of date we want to know at [email protected].

Where Licentry is different

Licentry assumes someone is actively trying to run your software without paying, and is built around that.

The licence is a live session, not a boolean

A check that returns true or false is one instruction for someone to flip in a debugger. Licentry holds a signed session open while your app runs and keeps it alive with heartbeats, so revoking a licence stops a copy that is already running rather than waiting for the next launch.

A copied token is useless on another machine

Sessions are bound to the device that opened them using DPoP, which is RFC 9449. Each request carries a proof signed by a key that never leaves that machine, so lifting the token out of memory and pasting it somewhere else gets you nothing.

Every Windows download carries the buyer with it

Windows executables are watermarked per customer as they are downloaded. When a copy shows up on a forum, the mark names the account it was issued to, which turns a rumour into something you can act on. Someone who repacks the file can strip it.

Side by side

Every row is written so a tick is the answer you want, and their ticks are still ticks. Where we could not confirm something about Keygen from their own documentation it is marked as not advertised, rather than as a no.

Capability Keygen Licentry
Starts under 20 dollars a month Listed from 49 19
Stolen token fails on another machine ~Not advertised DPoP, RFC 9449
App can prove the reply came from us ~Not advertised Signed, P-256
Leaked build points back to one buyer ~Not advertised Watermarked, Windows
Evidence when a key gets shared ~Not advertised Devices, IPs, geography
Licence checked while the app runs Heartbeats Signed session
Works in any language on day one Five HTTPS calls
Free to self-host Community Edition ~Dedicated server, Studio
Ships releases and auto-updates Distribution API ~Hosted builds
Official SDK for your language Five languages ~HTTPS instead

does it  ~ partly, or depends on the tier   not what it is for

When Keygen is the better choice

We would rather lose the signup than have you switch and regret it. These are real reasons to buy theirs instead.

You want to self-host and pay nothing

Keygen CE is free to run on your own hardware, commercial use included. Licentry runs your account on a dedicated server on request, but that sits on the Studio plan and is not free. If owning the whole stack at zero licence cost is the requirement, Keygen wins outright and we would rather you knew that now.

Shipping and updating builds is the actual problem

Keygen has a distribution API with engines for npm, PyPI, RubyGems, Docker and Tauri, plus a CLI for signing and publishing releases. Licentry hosts your builds and watermarks each Windows download per buyer, but it is not a package registry and does not pretend to be one.

You want an official SDK

Keygen publishes SDKs for Go, Python, Node, Ruby and PHP. Licentry deliberately has none. Integration is five HTTPS calls in whatever language you already use, which is better if your language was never going to get an SDK and worse if you wanted one handed to you.

The short version

Keygen is a good product and the free self-hosted edition is a genuinely strong offer. If you want to own the infrastructure, or distributing builds is the job, buy theirs. If the thing keeping you up is people running your software without paying, that is the part we build for, and it is where the two products actually diverge.

Five HTTPS calls and no SDK to install, so you can have this working before you decide.